Why, for a Class of Bribes, the Act of Giving a Bribe should
: Under current laws, both the giver and taker are culpable, meaning they share an interest in keeping the crime secret. By granting the giver immunity, their interests diverge after the act, incentivizing the giver to report the official. The Bribe
Basu proposes a novel strategy to reduce corruption, specifically targeting "harassment bribes" (bribes paid for services one is legally entitled to, such as tax refunds or subsidized land paperwork): Why, for a Class of Bribes, the Act
: This mechanism is known as asymmetric liability . While it has the potential to reduce corruption, some research suggests it may face challenges if economic incentives for the giver are weak or if they fear retaliation. Other Potential References Depending on the context, you might also be looking for: While it has the potential to reduce corruption,
: Basu argues that the act of giving a harassment bribe should be declared legitimate and granted full immunity.